|
Consideration
|
Instructions
|
PTS
|
|
Location of audience
|
If the audience is
- all at the same location 0
- at multiple remote sites 5
- a field force at individual locations
10
|
|
|
Frequency of changes.
|
If the program
- will not change very often 5
- will change frequently 10
|
|
|
Variety of media.
|
If the program requires
- full motion video -10
- sound and limited video 0
- text, graphics and animation 10
|
|
|
Content
|
If the content
- has not been developed yet 0
- has been successfully used in a classroom
5
- has been successfully used in an interactive
program 10
|
|
|
Links to other content
|
If the content being presented
- stands alone 0
- would benefit from links to other Web
sites 10
|
|
|
Amount of interactivity
|
If the program
- is fully interactive learning with immediate
feedback 5
- has limited interactivity 10
|
|
|
Preferred learning style.
|
If learners prefer
- Group learning 0
- Independent learning 10
|
|
|
Preferred training schedule.
|
If it is more appropriate to
- Set training schedules 3
- Allow learners to set schedules 10
|
|
|
Current learner skill level.
|
If learners
- All have the same skill level 5
- Have widely varying skill level 10
|
|
|
Importance of consistency.
|
If consistency is
- Not important 0
- Somewhat important 5
- Very important 10
|
|
|
Need for performance tracking.
|
If performance tracking across multiple
courses or modules is
- Not needed 0
- Desirable 5
- Required 10
|
|
|
Content.
|
If skills are
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
Consideration
|
Instrauctions
|
PTS
|
|
Management's past experience with technology
based training.
|
If past experience with technology based
training was
Not favorable 0
Neutral 5
Very favorable 10
|
|
|
General view of technology.
|
If management views technology as
Awful 0
A necessary evil 5
Great 10
|
|
|
User experience
|
If the target audience on a regular basis
- does not use e-mail nor the World Wide
Web 0
- uses e-mail but not the World Wide Web
5
- uses the World Wide Web 10
|
|
|
Experience with MM Training.
|
If your company
- has never implemented a MM Training
program 0
- has implemented stand-alone MM Training
programs 5
- has implemented networked MM Training
programs 10
|
|
|
Mode of access.
|
If the a significant number of the target
audience currently
- has no access to the Internet/ Intranet
-20
- has dial-up access to the Internet/
Intranet 0
- has real-time access to the Internet/
Intranet 10
|
|
|
Budgeting scheme.
|
For cost comparisons, if development costs
- Are separated from costs of delivery
0
- Are included with delivery costs 10
|
|
|
Availability of hardware at learner site.
|
If hardware at learner site is
- Not available at all 0
- Available but has to be upgraded 5
- Available 10
|
|
|
Management's perception of person making
recommendation.
|
If person making recommendation
- Has a poor track record -10
- Has no track record 0
- Has a great track record 10
|
|
|
Project management skills of staff.
|
If staff can
- NOT manage an Internet/Intranet project
0
- Manage project 10
|
|
|
Administration
|
If
- no-one is available to administer the
program -5
- the administrator does not have Internet
experience 0
- the administrator has Internet experience
5
|
|
|
Availability and knowledge of Internet
design and authoring language.
|
If staff
- Does not know anything about authoring
0
- Will contract with experienced designers/authors
10
- Can design & author applications
10
|
|
|
Availability of hardware trouble shooters.
|
If trouble shooters
- Can not be made available 0
- Can be made available 10
|
|
|
Use of existing trainers.
|
If existing trainers
- Will no longer be needed 0
- Can be transferred to new positions
5
- Can be used on Internet/Intranet projects
10
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|